Core i5-6440EQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838

Core i5-6440EQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-6440EQ

4 / 4

5,329

0.0%

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

+0.3%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6440EQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6440EQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6440EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 838 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,329 vs 5,343).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6440EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is MediaTek Kompanio 838 better than Core i5-6440EQ?

Yes. MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 is still the much better call for a fresh build. MediaTek Kompanio 838 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-6440EQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older DDR4-era platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6440EQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6440EQ

The Core i5-6440EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,329 points. Launch price was $250.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6440EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-6440EQ versus 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-6440EQ. The Core i5-6440EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024). In PassMark, the Core i5-6440EQ scores 5,329 against the MediaTek Kompanio 838's 5,343 — a 0.3% lead for the MediaTek Kompanio 838.

Feature	Core i5-6440EQ	MediaTek Kompanio 838
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+23%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	5,329	5,343
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,136	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6440EQ) / not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 838). The Core i5-6440EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6440EQ targets Workstation.