Core i5-6440EQ vs FX-8370E

CPU

GPU

Core i5-6440EQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

FX-8370E

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-6440EQ vs FX-8370E Performance Spectrum

Core i5-6440EQ

4 / 4

5,329

+0.1%

5,324

0.0%

Athlon Silver 3050e

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6440EQ vs FX-8370E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6440EQ vs FX-8370E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6440EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+67% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while FX-8370E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8370E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 26.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8370E.

FX-8370E

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-6440EQ.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,878 vs 3,136).
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6440EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6440EQ better than FX-8370E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8370E is ahead with a 30.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6440EQ pulls ahead with 67% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6440EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 67% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6440EQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-6440EQ comes in 25.6% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you 67% better Geekbench multi-core. FX-8370E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 25.5% better value on paper (26.8 vs 21.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6440EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6440EQ vs FX-8370E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6440EQ

The Core i5-6440EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,329 points. Launch price was $250.

FX-8370E

The FX-8370E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6440EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8370E offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-6440EQ versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370E — a 45.7% clock advantage for the FX-8370E. The Core i5-6440EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8370E uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6440EQ scores 5,329 against the FX-8370E's 5,324 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-6440EQ. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 900 vs 512, a 55% lead for the Core i5-6440EQ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,136 vs 1,878 (50.2% advantage for the Core i5-6440EQ).

Feature	Core i5-6440EQ	FX-8370E
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	4.3 GHz+59%
Base Clock	—	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	8192 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	5,329	5,324
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	900+76%	512
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,136+67%	1,878

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6440EQ versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8370E — the Core i5-6440EQ supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6440EQ supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-6440EQ) vs 0 (FX-8370E) — the Core i5-6440EQ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: QM170,HM170 (Core i5-6440EQ) and AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8370E).

Feature	Core i5-6440EQ	FX-8370E
Socket	—	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+14%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8370E has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6440EQ) vs AMD-V (FX-8370E). The Core i5-6440EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the FX-8370E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6440EQ targets Workstation.

Feature	Core i5-6440EQ	FX-8370E
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-6440EQ was priced at $250, while the FX-8370E came in at $199. On launch pricing ($250 vs $199), FX-8370E was $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6440EQ delivers 21.3 pts/$ vs 26.8 pts/$ for the FX-8370E — making the FX-8370E the 22.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-6440EQ	FX-8370E
MSRP	$250	$199-20%
Performance per Dollar	21.3	26.8+26%
Release Date	2015	2014

Search Core i5-6440EQ on Amazon

Search FX-8370E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.