
Core i5-6440EQ vs FX-8370E

Core i5-6440EQ

FX-8370E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6440EQ is positioned at rank 765 and the FX-8370E is on rank 646, so the FX-8370E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6440EQ
Performance Per Dollar FX-8370E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-6440EQ | FX-8370E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-6440EQ | FX-8370E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+87%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6440EQ and FX-8370E

Core i5-6440EQ
The Core i5-6440EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,329 points. Launch price was $250.

FX-8370E
The FX-8370E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6440EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8370E offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-6440EQ versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370E — a 45.7% clock advantage for the FX-8370E. The Core i5-6440EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8370E uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6440EQ scores 5,329 against the FX-8370E's 5,324 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-6440EQ. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 900 vs 512, a 55% lead for the Core i5-6440EQ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,136 vs 1,878 (50.2% advantage for the Core i5-6440EQ).
| Feature | Core i5-6440EQ | FX-8370E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8192 kB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,329 | 5,324 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900+76% | 512 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,136+67% | 1,878 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6440EQ versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8370E — the Core i5-6440EQ supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6440EQ supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-6440EQ) vs 0 (FX-8370E) — the Core i5-6440EQ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: QM170,HM170 (Core i5-6440EQ) and AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8370E).
| Feature | Core i5-6440EQ | FX-8370E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+33% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the FX-8370E has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6440EQ) vs AMD-V (FX-8370E). The Core i5-6440EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the FX-8370E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6440EQ targets Workstation.
| Feature | Core i5-6440EQ | FX-8370E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-6440EQ launched at $250 MSRP, while the FX-8370E debuted at $199. At current prices ($150 vs $80), the FX-8370E is $70 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6440EQ delivers 35.5 pts/$ vs 66.5 pts/$ for the FX-8370E — making the FX-8370E the 60.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-6440EQ | FX-8370E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $199-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $80-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.5 | 66.5+87% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















