MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E3-1245

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 Cores8 Thrdβˆ’WMax: 2.2 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1245

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E3-1245 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E3-1245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E3-1245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (5,343 vs 5,346).

Xeon E3-1245

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 838 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1245 better than MediaTek Kompanio 838?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E3-1245 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1245 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E3-1245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E3-1245

The Xeon E3-1245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,346 points. Launch price was $350.

⚑

Processing Power

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 offers 4 cores / 8 threads β€” the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 β€” a 50.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1245 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022βˆ’2024) architecture, while the Xeon E3-1245 uses Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the MediaTek Kompanio 838 scores 5,343 against the Xeon E3-1245's 5,346 β€” a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1245.

FeatureMediaTek Kompanio 838Xeon E3-1245
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz+68%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.3 GHz+65%
L3 Cache
β€”
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
β€”
256 kB (per core)
Process
β€”
32 nm
Architecture
Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022βˆ’2024)
Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013)
PassMark
5,343
5,346