Core i7-4700MQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838
Core i7-4700MQ
MediaTek Kompanio 838
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4700MQ is positioned at rank 1000 and the MediaTek Kompanio 838 is on rank 103, so the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700MQ
Performance Per Dollar MediaTek Kompanio 838
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-4700MQ | MediaTek Kompanio 838 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) / Standard Node) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-4700MQ | MediaTek Kompanio 838 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4700MQ and MediaTek Kompanio 838
Core i7-4700MQ
The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.
MediaTek Kompanio 838
The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4700MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ versus 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4700MQ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-4700MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700MQ scores 5,349 against the MediaTek Kompanio 838's 5,343 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-4700MQ.
| Feature | Core i7-4700MQ | MediaTek Kompanio 838 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 22 nm | — |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) |
| PassMark | 5,349 | 5,343 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-4700MQ and MediaTek Kompanio 838
