
Core i7-4700EQ
Popular choices:

Core i7-4700MQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4700EQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-4700MQ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-4700MQ
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,349 vs 5,417).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌1.3% HIGHER MSRP$383 MSRPvs$378 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4700EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4700EQ
2013Core i7-4700MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-4700MQ needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,349 vs 5,417).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌1.3% HIGHER MSRP$383 MSRPvs$378 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4700EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4700EQ better than Core i7-4700MQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4700EQ and Core i7-4700MQ

Core i7-4700EQ
Core i7-4700EQ
The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4700MQ
Core i7-4700MQ
The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-4700EQ and Core i7-4700MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-4700EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700EQ scores 5,417 against the Core i7-4700MQ's 5,349 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700MQ.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,417+1% | 5,349 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4700EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ) / not specified (Core i7-4700MQ). The Core i7-4700EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-4700MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4700EQ launched at $378 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700MQ debuted at $383. On MSRP ($378 vs $383), the Core i7-4700EQ is $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4700EQ delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700MQ — making the Core i7-4700EQ the 2.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378-1% | $383 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3+2% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












