Core i7-3770T
VS
Core i7-4700EQ

Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Core i7-3770T

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3770T is positioned at rank 805 and the Core i7-4700EQ is on rank 994, so the Core i7-3770T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16035%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15151%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11001%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3314%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2625%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2297%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1315%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1298%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1182%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1182%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1169%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1137%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1121%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1117%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1107%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
100%
#807
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#808
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
99%
#809
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
99%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
99%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
98%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
98%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
97%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
97%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
97%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700EQ

#982
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2047%
#983
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2017%
#984
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1852%
#985
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1844%
#986
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1827%
#988
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1764%
#989
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1692%
#990
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1689%
#991
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1643%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
100%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
100%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
98%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
98%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
95%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3770T leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-4700EQ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-3770TCore i7-4700EQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($105)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-3770T stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 42% cheaper ($105 vs $180) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-3770TCore i7-4700EQ
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+71%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($105)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3770T and Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Core i7-3770T

The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3770T and Core i7-4700EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-3770T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770T scores 5,403 against the Core i7-4700EQ's 5,417 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. Both processors carry 8192 kB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-3770TCore i7-4700EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+9%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+4%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,403
5,417
Geekbench 6 Single
850
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,859
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3770T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-3770TCore i7-4700EQ
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-3770T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770T) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4700EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-3770TCore i7-4700EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3770T launched at $278 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700EQ debuted at $378. At current prices ($105 vs $180), the Core i7-3770T is $75 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770T delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700EQ — making the Core i7-3770T the 52.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3770TCore i7-4700EQ
MSRP
$278-26%
$378
Avg Price (30d)
$105-42%
$180
Performance per Dollar
51.5+71%
30.1
Release Date
2012
2013