Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3770T

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($278 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($278 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 47W, a 2W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4700EQ.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,403 vs 5,417).

Core i7-4700EQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3770T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-3770T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3770T better than Core i7-4700EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-3770T is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4700EQ pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4700EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3770T is the better buy right now. Core i7-3770T comes in $100 cheaper on MSRP at $278 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-4700EQ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 35.6% better value on MSRP (19.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4700EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3770T

The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3770T and Core i7-4700EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-3770T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770T scores 5,403 against the Core i7-4700EQ's 5,417 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. Both processors carry 8192 kB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-3770T	Core i7-4700EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,403	5,417
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,859	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3770T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i7-3770T	Core i7-4700EQ
Socket	LGA1155	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-3770T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770T) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4700EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i7-3770T	Core i7-4700EQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4000	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-3770T was priced at $278, while the Core i7-4700EQ came in at $378. On launch pricing ($278 vs $378), Core i7-3770T was $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770T delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700EQ — making the Core i7-3770T the 30.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-3770T	Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP	$278-26%	$378
Performance per Dollar	19.4+36%	14.3
Release Date	2012	2013

Search Core i7-3770T on Amazon

Search Core i7-4700EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.