Atom x7425E vs Core i7-3770T
Atom x7425E
Core i7-3770T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7425E is positioned at rank 213 and the Core i7-3770T is on rank 805, so the Atom x7425E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7425E
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x7425E | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x7425E | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7425E and Core i7-3770T
Atom x7425E
The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i7-3770T
The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.
Processing Power
The Atom x7425E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3770T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-3770T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i7-3770T's 5,403 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T.
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Gracemont (2023) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,427 | 5,403 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 850 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,859 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-3770T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3770T — the Atom x7425E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3770T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i7-3770T). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i7-3770T) — the Core i7-3770T offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i7-3770T).
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+67% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / Yes (Core i7-3770T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom x7425E and Core i7-3770T
