Atom x7425E vs Core i7-3770T

Intel

Atom x7425E

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-3770T

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-3770T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-3770T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-3770T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7425E

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 12W instead of 45W, a 33W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3770T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-3770T.

Core i7-3770T

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7425E.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,403 vs 5,427).
  • Launch MSRP is still $278 MSRP, while Atom x7425E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 275% higher power demand at 45W vs 12W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1155, while Atom x7425E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7425E better than Core i7-3770T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-3770T is ahead with a 17.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-3770T also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom x7425E is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom x7425E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $278 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-3770T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (19.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7425E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-3770T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-3770T

The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.

Processing Power

The Atom x7425E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3770T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-3770T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i7-3770T's 5,403 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i7-3770T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Gracemont (2023)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
5,427
5,403
Geekbench 6 Single
850
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,859
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-3770T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3770T — the Atom x7425E supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3770T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i7-3770T). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i7-3770T) — the Core i7-3770T offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i7-3770T).

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i7-3770T
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+200%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / Yes (Core i7-3770T). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i7-3770T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (24EU)
Intel HD Graphics 4000
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes