
Atom x7425E

Core i7-2600K
Atom x7425E vs Core i7-2600K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7425E vs Core i7-2600K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7425E vs Core i7-2600K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7425E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 95W, a 83W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,427 vs 5,484).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-2600K.
Core i7-2600K
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7425E.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $317 MSRP, while Atom x7425E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌691.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 12W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Atom x7425E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2600K better than Atom x7425E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7425E vs Core i7-2600K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7425E
The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-2600K
The Core i7-2600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $317.
Processing Power
The Atom x7425E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2600K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600K — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600K (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-2600K uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i7-2600K's 5,484 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-2600K. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2600K.
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i7-2600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+127% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Gracemont (2023) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,427 | 5,484+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 707 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-2600K uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2600K — the Atom x7425E supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-2600K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i7-2600K). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i7-2600K) — the Core i7-2600K offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E) and P67,Z68,Z77,H67,H61,B75 (Core i7-2600K).
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i7-2600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+260% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x (Core i7-2600K). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600K rivals FX-8150.
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i7-2600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














