Atom x7425E
VS
Core i5-6400

Atom x7425E vs Core i5-6400

Intel

Atom x7425E

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i5-6400

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7425E is positioned at rank 213 and the Core i5-6400 is on rank 600, so the Atom x7425E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7425E

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#201
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
378%
#202
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
373%
#203
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
342%
#204
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
341%
#205
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
338%
#207
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
326%
#208
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
313%
#209
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
312%
#210
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
304%
#213
Atom x7425E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10474%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9897%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7186%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2165%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1715%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1500%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
859%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
848%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
772%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
772%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
763%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
743%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
732%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
729%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
723%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
96%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
100%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
99%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
99%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
99%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
99%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
99%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
98%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
96%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7425E (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7425ECore i5-6400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($57)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-6400 (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7425ECore i5-6400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($57)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7425E and Core i5-6400

Intel

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-6400

The Core i5-6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $187.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7425E and Core i5-6400 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-6400 — a 3% clock advantage for the Atom x7425E (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-6400 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i5-6400's 5,417 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom x7425E. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i5-6400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+3%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Gracemont (2023)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
5,427
5,417
Geekbench 6 Single
950
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-6400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6400 — the Atom x7425E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i5-6400). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i5-6400) — the Core i5-6400 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Core i5-6400).

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i5-6400
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6400). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Core i5-6400) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6400 targets Mainstream Desktop.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i5-6400
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (24EU)
Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop