Atom x7425E
VS
Core i5-7400

Atom x7425E vs Core i5-7400

Intel

Atom x7425E

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i5-7400

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7425E is positioned at rank 213 and the Core i5-7400 is on rank 820, so the Atom x7425E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7425E

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#201
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
378%
#202
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
373%
#203
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
342%
#204
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
341%
#205
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
338%
#207
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
326%
#208
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
313%
#209
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
312%
#210
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
304%
#213
Atom x7425E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16732%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15810%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11479%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3458%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2396%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1373%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1355%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1233%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1233%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1219%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1187%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1170%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1165%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1155%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
100%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
100%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
99%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
98%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
98%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
98%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7425E (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7425ECore i5-7400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-7400 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7425ECore i5-7400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7425E and Core i5-7400

Intel

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-7400

The Core i5-7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,477 points. Launch price was $182.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7425E and Core i5-7400 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7400 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-7400 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-7400 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i5-7400's 5,477 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-7400. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i5-7400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+3%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Gracemont (2023)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
5,427
5,477
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,359
Geekbench 6 Single
1,215
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,517
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-7400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400 — the Atom x7425E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i5-7400). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i5-7400) — the Core i5-7400 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E) and 100-series,200-series (Core i5-7400).

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i5-7400
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7400). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7400) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-7400 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i5-7400
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (24EU)
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming