Atom x7425E
VS
Core i7-4700EQ

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Atom x7425E

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7425E is positioned at rank 213 and the Core i7-4700EQ is on rank 994, so the Atom x7425E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7425E

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#201
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
378%
#202
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
373%
#203
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
342%
#204
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
341%
#205
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
338%
#207
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
326%
#208
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
313%
#209
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
312%
#210
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
304%
#213
Atom x7425E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700EQ

#982
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2047%
#983
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2017%
#984
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1852%
#985
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1844%
#986
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1827%
#988
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1764%
#989
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1692%
#990
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1689%
#991
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1643%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
100%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
100%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
98%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
98%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
95%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7425E (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7425ECore i7-4700EQ
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4700EQ (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7425ECore i7-4700EQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7425E and Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom x7425E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4700EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i7-4700EQ's 5,417 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i7-4700EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Gracemont (2023)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,427
5,417
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4700EQ — the Atom x7425E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-4700EQ supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i7-4700EQ). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i7-4700EQ) — the Core i7-4700EQ offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i7-4700EQ
Socket
FCBGA1744
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+67%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4700EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i7-4700EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (24EU)
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile