Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4700EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4700EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4700EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7425E

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 12W instead of 47W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1364 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-4700EQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,417 vs 5,427).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Atom x7425E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌291.7% higher power demand at 47W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on BGA1364, while Atom x7425E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7425E better than Core i7-4700EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4700EQ is ahead with a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i7-4700EQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7425E is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom x7425E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Core i7-4700EQ only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7425E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of BGA1364, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4700EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7425E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4700EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i7-4700EQ's 5,417 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ.

Feature	Atom x7425E	Core i7-4700EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Gracemont (2023)	Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,427	5,417

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4700EQ — the Atom x7425E supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-4700EQ supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i7-4700EQ). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i7-4700EQ) — the Core i7-4700EQ offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom x7425E	Core i7-4700EQ
Socket	FCBGA1744	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+200%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	9	16+78%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4700EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.