Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4702HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4702HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4702HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7425E

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 12W instead of 37W, a 25W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1364 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (24EU), while Core i7-4702HQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4702HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-4702HQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,406 vs 5,427).
❌208.3% higher power demand at 37W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on BGA1364, while Atom x7425E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7425E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7425E better than Core i7-4702HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4702HQ is ahead with a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-4702HQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7425E still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7425E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7425E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of BGA1364, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7425E vs Core i7-4702HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4702HQ

The Core i7-4702HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,406 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7425E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4702HQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702HQ — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7425E (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4702HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i7-4702HQ's 5,406 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702HQ.

Feature	Atom x7425E	Core i7-4702HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.2 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Gracemont (2023)	Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,427	5,406

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-4702HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7425E	Core i7-4702HQ
Socket	FCBGA1744	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—