
Core i7-3770T

Xeon E3-1270
Core i7-3770T vs Xeon E3-1270 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3770T vs Xeon E3-1270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3770T vs Xeon E3-1270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3770T
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $52 less on MSRP ($278 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.4 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($278 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E3-1270
2011Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3770T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,376 vs 5,403).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($330 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3770T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3770T better than Xeon E3-1270?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3770T vs Xeon E3-1270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3770T
The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.

Xeon E3-1270
The Xeon E3-1270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,376 points. Launch price was $369.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-3770T and Xeon E3-1270 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1270 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-3770T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770T scores 5,403 against the Xeon E3-1270's 5,376 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-3770T. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1270.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Xeon E3-1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,403 | 5,376 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,859 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Xeon E3-1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3770T) / not specified (Xeon E3-1270). The Core i7-3770T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E3-1270 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Xeon E3-1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3770T was priced at $278, while the Xeon E3-1270 came in at $330. On launch pricing ($278 vs $330), Core i7-3770T was $52 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770T delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1270 — making the Core i7-3770T the 17.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Xeon E3-1270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $278-16% | $330 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.4+19% | 16.3 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














