
Core i3-8300T

Core i7-3770T
Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-3770T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-3770T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-3770T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-8300T
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.0 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3770T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,378 vs 5,403).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-3770T.
Core i7-3770T
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-8300T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($278 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3770T better than Core i3-8300T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-3770T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300T
The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

Core i7-3770T
The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.
Processing Power
The Core i3-8300T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3770T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-8300T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3770T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300T scores 5,378 against the Core i7-3770T's 5,403 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-3770T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300T vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T.
| Feature | Core i3-8300T | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+28% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,378 | 5,403 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 850 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,859 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-8300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3770T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8300T versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3770T — the Core i3-8300T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-8300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i3-8300T | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T) vs Yes (Core i7-3770T). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8300T) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-8300T | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-8300T was priced at $138, while the Core i7-3770T came in at $278. On launch pricing ($138 vs $278), Core i3-8300T was $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300T delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 19.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-3770T — making the Core i3-8300T the 66.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-8300T | Core i7-3770T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-50% | $278 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.0+101% | 19.4 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













