PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-4700EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-4700EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300T

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 171.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.0 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,378 vs 5,417).

Core i7-4700EQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4700EQ better than Core i3-8300T?

Yes. Core i7-4700EQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4700EQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4700EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4700EQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-4700EQ comes in 173.9% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-8300T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 171.9% better value on paper (39.0 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-4700EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8300T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4700EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4700EQ (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-8300T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300T scores 5,378 against the Core i7-4700EQ's 5,417 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300T vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,378	5,417

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8300T versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4700EQ — the Core i3-8300T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-8300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700EQ
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8300T) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4700EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop, Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700EQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8300T was priced at $138, while the Core i7-4700EQ came in at $378. On launch pricing ($138 vs $378), Core i3-8300T was $240 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300T delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700EQ — making the Core i3-8300T the 92.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP	$138-63%	$378
Performance per Dollar	39.0+173%	14.3
Release Date	2018	2013

Search Core i3-8300T on Amazon

Search Core i7-4700EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.