Core i3-8300T vs Xeon E3-1270

Intel

Core i3-8300T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1270

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-8300T vs Xeon E3-1270 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300T vs Xeon E3-1270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300T vs Xeon E3-1270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300T

2018

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $192 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
  • Delivers 139.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.0 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1270 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1270, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E3-1270

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,376 vs 5,378).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($330 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
  • 128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8300T better than Xeon E3-1270?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1270 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-8300T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-8300T is the better buy right now. Core i3-8300T comes in $192 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $330 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1270 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 139.2% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 16.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8300T vs Xeon E3-1270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

Intel

Xeon E3-1270

The Xeon E3-1270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,376 points. Launch price was $369.

Processing Power

The Core i3-8300T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1270's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1270 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-8300T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300T scores 5,378 against the Xeon E3-1270's 5,376 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-8300T. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-8300TXeon E3-1270
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
5,378
5,376
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1270 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-8300TXeon E3-1270
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T) / not specified (Xeon E3-1270). The Core i3-8300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-8300TXeon E3-1270
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8300T was priced at $138, while the Xeon E3-1270 came in at $330. On launch pricing ($138 vs $330), Core i3-8300T was $192 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300T delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1270 — making the Core i3-8300T the 82.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-8300TXeon E3-1270
MSRP
$138-58%
$330
Performance per Dollar
39.0+139%
16.3
Release Date
2018
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.