Core i3-8300T vs N150

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300T vs N150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300T vs N150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300T

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while N150 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,378 vs 5,418).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while N150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while N150 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N150

2025

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is N150 better than Core i3-8300T?

Yes. N150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, N150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, N150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

N150 is still the much better call for a fresh build. N150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-8300T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-8300T vs N150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

N150

The N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-8300T and N150 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T versus 3.6 GHz on the N150 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the N150. The Core i3-8300T is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-8300T scores 5,378 against the N150's 5,418 — a 0.7% lead for the N150. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300T vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N150.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	N150
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	5,378	5,418

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N150 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	N150
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T) / not specified (N150). The Core i3-8300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the N150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.