Atom x7425E vs Core i3-8300T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7425E vs Core i3-8300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7425E vs Core i3-8300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7425E

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 12W instead of 35W, a 23W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i3-8300T

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,378 vs 5,427).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Atom x7425E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌191.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Atom x7425E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7425E better than Core i3-8300T?

Yes. Atom x7425E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7425E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7425E is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom x7425E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-8300T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7425E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7425E vs Core i3-8300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7425E and Core i3-8300T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7425E (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-8300T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i3-8300T's 5,378 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300T.

Feature	Atom x7425E	Core i3-8300T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+113%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Gracemont (2023)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	5,427	5,378

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-8300T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8300T — the Atom x7425E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-8300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i3-8300T). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i3-8300T) — the Core i3-8300T offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom x7425E	Core i3-8300T
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+100%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	9	16+78%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8300T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.