Atom x7425E
VS
Core i3-8300T

Atom x7425E vs Core i3-8300T

Intel

Atom x7425E

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i3-8300T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom x7425E is positioned at rank #213 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7425E

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#201
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
378%
#202
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
373%
#203
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
342%
#204
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
341%
#205
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
338%
#207
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
326%
#208
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
313%
#209
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
312%
#210
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
304%
#213
Atom x7425E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8300T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1449%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1369%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
994%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
299%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
237%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
208%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
119%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
117%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
107%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
107%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
106%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
103%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
101%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
101%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
100%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
98%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
96%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
95%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
94%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
93%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
90%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
88%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
87%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
87%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
86%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
85%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
85%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
84%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
83%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Atom x7425E delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-8300T in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom x7425ECore i3-8300T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom x7425ECore i3-8300T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7425E and Core i3-8300T

Intel

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7425E and Core i3-8300T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7425E (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-8300T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i3-8300T's 5,378 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300T.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i3-8300T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+6%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+113%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Gracemont (2023)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
5,427
5,378
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-8300T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8300T — the Atom x7425E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-8300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i3-8300T). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i3-8300T) — the Core i3-8300T offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i3-8300T
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8300T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.

FeatureAtom x7425ECore i3-8300T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (24EU)
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop