Core i7-4700EQ
VS
Xeon E5-2609 v4

Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E5-2609 v4

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v4

8 Cores8 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4700EQ is positioned at rank 994 and the Xeon E5-2609 v4 is on rank 526, so the Xeon E5-2609 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700EQ

#982
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2047%
#983
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2017%
#984
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1852%
#985
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1844%
#986
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1827%
#988
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1764%
#989
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1692%
#990
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1689%
#991
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1643%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
100%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
100%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
98%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
98%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
95%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v4

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7672%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1448%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1287%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
994%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
98%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
98%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
97%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
97%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
96%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
96%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
95%
#526
Xeon E5-2609 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-4700EQXeon E5-2609 v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4700EQ ($180), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($180 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-4700EQXeon E5-2609 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5-2609 v4

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v4

The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $306.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4700EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v4 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4700EQ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-4700EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700EQ scores 5,417 against the Xeon E5-2609 v4's 5,418 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v4. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2609 v4.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQXeon E5-2609 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+100%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+41%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
20 MB+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
5,417
5,418
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4700EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQXeon E5-2609 v4
Socket
BGA1364
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ) / not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v4). The Core i7-4700EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQXeon E5-2609 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile