Core i7-4700MQ vs N100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4700MQ vs N100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4700MQ vs N100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4700MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,349 vs 5,355).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 41.8 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
❌683.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on PGA946, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N100

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 199.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
✅Draws 6W instead of 47W, a 41W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is N100 better than Core i7-4700MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4700MQ is ahead with a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, N100 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, N100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

N100 is the better buy right now. N100 comes in $255 cheaper on MSRP at $128 MSRP versus $383 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4700MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 199.6% better value on MSRP (41.8 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of PGA946, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-4700MQ vs N100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4700MQ

The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.

N100

The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4700MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the N100's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ versus 3.4 GHz on the N100 — identical boost frequencies. The Core i7-4700MQ is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-4700MQ scores 5,349 against the N100's 5,355 — a 0.1% lead for the N100. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700MQ vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100.

Feature	Core i7-4700MQ	N100
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	—
PassMark	5,349	5,355

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4700MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N100 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4700MQ	N100
Socket	PGA946	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4700MQ was priced at $383, while the N100 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($383 vs $128), N100 was $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4700MQ delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 41.8 pts/$ for the N100 — making the N100 the 99.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4700MQ	N100
MSRP	$383	$128-67%
Performance per Dollar	14.0	41.8+199%
Release Date	2013	2023

Search Core i7-4700MQ on Amazon

Search N100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.