Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700MQ
Core i7-3770T
Core i7-4700MQ
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3770T is positioned at rank 805 and the Core i7-4700MQ is on rank 1000, so the Core i7-3770T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770T
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700MQ
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+108%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3770T and Core i7-4700MQ
Core i7-3770T
The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.
Core i7-4700MQ
The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-3770T and Core i7-4700MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-3770T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770T scores 5,403 against the Core i7-4700MQ's 5,349 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-3770T. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700MQ.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,403+1% | 5,349 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,859 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3770T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3770T) / not specified (Core i7-4700MQ). The Core i7-3770T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i7-4700MQ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-3770T launched at $278 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700MQ debuted at $383. At current prices ($105 vs $50), the Core i7-4700MQ is $55 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770T delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 107.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700MQ — making the Core i7-4700MQ the 70.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $278-27% | $383 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $105 | $50-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.5 | 107.0+108% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-3770T and Core i7-4700MQ
