
Core i7-3770T

Core i7-4700MQ
Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700MQ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700MQ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Dead by Daylight

Deadlock
Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3770T
2012Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $105 less on MSRP ($278 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.4 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($278 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 47W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-4700MQ
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,349 vs 5,403).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3770T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-3770T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3770T better than Core i7-4700MQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3770T vs Core i7-4700MQ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3770T
The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.

Core i7-4700MQ
The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-3770T and Core i7-4700MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-3770T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770T scores 5,403 against the Core i7-4700MQ's 5,349 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-3770T. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700MQ.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,403+1% | 5,349 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,859 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3770T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3770T) / not specified (Core i7-4700MQ). The Core i7-3770T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i7-4700MQ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3770T was priced at $278, while the Core i7-4700MQ came in at $383. On launch pricing ($278 vs $383), Core i7-3770T was $105 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770T delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700MQ — making the Core i7-3770T the 32.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $278-27% | $383 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.4+39% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














