Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-4700MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-4700MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-4700MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300T

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $245 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 179.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i7-4700MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,349 vs 5,378).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8300T better than Core i7-4700MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4700MQ is ahead with a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8300T pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i3-8300T also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8300T is the better buy right now. Core i3-8300T comes in $245 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $383 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4700MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 179.0% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8300T vs Core i7-4700MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

Core i7-4700MQ

The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8300T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4700MQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4700MQ (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-8300T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300T scores 5,378 against the Core i7-4700MQ's 5,349 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-8300T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700MQ.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,378	5,349

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700MQ
Socket	LGA1151	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T) / not specified (Core i7-4700MQ). The Core i3-8300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-4700MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700MQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8300T was priced at $138, while the Core i7-4700MQ came in at $383. On launch pricing ($138 vs $383), Core i3-8300T was $245 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300T delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700MQ — making the Core i3-8300T the 94.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP	$138-64%	$383
Performance per Dollar	39.0+179%	14.0
Release Date	2018	2013

Search Core i3-8300T on Amazon

Search Core i7-4700MQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.