Core i3-8300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 838

Core i3-8300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-8300T

4 / 4

5,378

+0.7%

Core i7-5600U

Pentium Dual Core T3200

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

0.0%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 838: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300T

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 838 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,343 vs 5,378).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8300T better than MediaTek Kompanio 838?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is ahead with a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8300T pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8300T is the better buy right now. Core i3-8300T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that MediaTek Kompanio 838 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-8300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300T

The Core i3-8300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,378 points. Launch price was $138.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8300T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8300T versus 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 — a 37% clock advantage for the Core i3-8300T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-8300T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300T scores 5,378 against the MediaTek Kompanio 838's 5,343 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-8300T.

Feature	Core i3-8300T	MediaTek Kompanio 838
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+45%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	5,378	5,343

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8300T) / not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 838). The Core i3-8300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300T targets Desktop.