MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon X5687

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon X5687 Performance Spectrum

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

0.0%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X5687

4 / 8

5,386

+0.8%

Core i7-5600U

Pentium Dual Core T3200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon X5687 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon X5687: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,343 vs 5,386).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5687, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.

Xeon X5687

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $552 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5687 better than MediaTek Kompanio 838?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5687 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5687 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5687 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5687 is the better buy right now. Xeon X5687 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $552 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon X5687 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5687

The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.

⚡

Processing Power

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5687 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 54.8% clock advantage for the Xeon X5687 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture, while the Xeon X5687 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the MediaTek Kompanio 838 scores 5,343 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon X5687.

Feature	MediaTek Kompanio 838	Xeon X5687
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.86 GHz+75%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	—	32 nm
Architecture	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,343	5,386
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,643
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,386