Xeon E5-2630
VS
Core i5-6600

Xeon E5-2630 vs Core i5-6600

Intel

Xeon E5-2630

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-6600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2630 is positioned at rank 702 and the Core i5-6600 is on rank 641, so the Core i5-6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2630

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13513%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
98%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2551%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2267%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1751%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
100%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
100%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
100%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
99%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
99%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
99%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
99%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
98%
#418
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
MSRP: $11699|Avg: $11699
98%
#702
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
100%
#709
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#717
Xeon E5-4655 v3
MSRP: $623|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11528%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10893%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7909%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2383%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1887%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1651%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
946%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
933%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
850%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
850%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
840%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
818%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
806%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
803%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
796%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($395) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2630 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2630Core i5-6600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($395)
More affordable ($90)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-6600 ($90), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($305 less, 77% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2630Core i5-6600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+338%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($395)
More affordable ($90)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2630 and Core i5-6600

Intel

Xeon E5-2630

The Xeon E5-2630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,077 points. Launch price was $74.

Intel

Core i5-6600

The Core i5-6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,058 points. Launch price was $224.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2630 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-6600 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-6600 — a 32.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-6600 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2630 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-6600 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2630 scores 6,077 against the Core i5-6600's 6,058 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2630. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6600.

FeatureXeon E5-2630Core i5-6600
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.9 GHz+39%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache
15360 kB (total)+150%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
6,077
6,058
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2630 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-6600 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2630Core i5-6600
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2630 launched at $395 MSRP, while the Core i5-6600 debuted at $224. At current prices ($395 vs $90), the Core i5-6600 is $305 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2630 delivers 15.4 pts/$ vs 67.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-6600 — making the Core i5-6600 the 125.6% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2630Core i5-6600
MSRP
$395
$224-43%
Avg Price (30d)
$395
$90-77%
Performance per Dollar
15.4
67.3+337%
Release Date
2012
2015