Xeon E5-2630L v4 vs Xeon E5-2689

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2630L v4 vs Xeon E5-2689 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2630L v4 vs Xeon E5-2689: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2630L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 115W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2689

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,922 vs 9,966).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,800 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2630L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌109.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2630L v4 better than Xeon E5-2689?

Yes. Xeon E5-2630L v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2630L v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2630L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2630L v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2689 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2630L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,800 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2689 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2630L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012), 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2630L v4 vs Xeon E5-2689 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2630L v4

The Xeon E5-2630L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,966 points. Launch price was $612.

Xeon E5-2689

The Xeon E5-2689 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,922 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2630L v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2630L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630L v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 — a 21.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2689 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2630L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2630L v4 scores 9,966 against the Xeon E5-2689's 9,922 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2630L v4. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630L v4 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2689.

Feature	Xeon E5-2630L v4	Xeon E5-2689
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+24%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	25 MB+25%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+900%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	9,966	9,922