Xeon E5-2637 v2
VS
Core i7-4820K

Xeon E5-2637 v2 vs Core i7-4820K

Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-4820K

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2637 v2 is positioned at rank 446 and the Core i7-4820K is on rank 800, so the Xeon E5-2637 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2637 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
6402%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1209%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1074%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
830%
#287
EPYC 9355P
MSRP: $2998|Avg: $3026
100%
#288
Xeon w7-2595X
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $1600
100%
#289
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
MSRP: $2899|Avg: $2699.99
100%
#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
97%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
97%
#446
Xeon E5-2637 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#451
Xeon D-1718T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $302
99%
#452
Xeon D-1622
MSRP: $195|Avg: $170
98%
#453
Xeon E3-1290 v2
MSRP: $885|Avg: $125
98%
#454
Xeon E5-2420 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $112
98%
#455
Xeon E3-1285 v6
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
98%
#456
Xeon E3-1268L v5
MSRP: $377|Avg: $93
98%
#460
Xeon E5-1428L V2
MSRP: $494|Avg: $83
96%
#461
Xeon E5-1428L
MSRP: $480|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4820K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15888%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15012%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10900%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3284%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2601%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2275%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1303%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1286%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1171%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1171%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1158%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1127%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1111%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1106%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1096%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
100%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
100%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
100%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
99%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
99%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
99%
#807
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#808
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
99%
#809
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
99%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
98%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2637 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2637 v2Core i7-4820K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4820K ($40), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($40 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2637 v2Core i7-4820K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2637 v2 and Core i7-4820K

Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v2

The Xeon E5-2637 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,492 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Intel

Core i7-4820K

The Core i7-4820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,515 points. Launch price was $399.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2637 v2 and Core i7-4820K share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v2 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4820K — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4820K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2637 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4820K uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2637 v2 scores 6,492 against the Core i7-4820K's 6,515 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-4820K. Both processors carry 10 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon E5-2637 v2Core i7-4820K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
10 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark
6,492
6,515
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 4.0.

FeatureXeon E5-2637 v2Core i7-4820K
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0