Xeon E5-2640 vs Xeon E3-1245 v2
Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E3-1245 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2640 is positioned at rank 946 and the Xeon E3-1245 v2 is on rank 583, so the Xeon E3-1245 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2640
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1245 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2640 | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($885) | ✅ More affordable ($204) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2640 | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+337%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($885) | ✅ More affordable ($204) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E3-1245 v2
Xeon E5-2640
The Xeon E5-2640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,305 points. Launch price was $162.
Xeon E3-1245 v2
The Xeon E3-1245 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,357 points. Launch price was $462.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2640 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v2 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1245 v2 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2640 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2640 scores 6,305 against the Xeon E3-1245 v2's 6,357 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1245 v2. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1245 v2.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2640 | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 15360 kB (total)+88% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,305 | 6,357 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 659 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,273 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2640 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2640 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2640) vs 2 (Xeon E3-1245 v2). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2640) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1245 v2) — the Xeon E5-2640 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2640 | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB+1100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+150% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1245 v2). The Xeon E3-1245 v2 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4000), while the Xeon E5-2640 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 targets Server, Xeon E3-1245 v2 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2640 | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics P4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Server | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2640 launched at $885 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 debuted at $273.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2640 | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $885 | $273-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $204 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E3-1245 v2
