
Xeon E5-2650L

Xeon X5660
Xeon E5-2650L vs Xeon X5660 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E5-2650L vs Xeon X5660 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E5-2650L vs Xeon X5660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E5-2650L
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $471 less on MSRP ($748 MSRP vs $1,219 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($748 MSRP vs $1,219 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 95W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon X5660
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650L across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,979 vs 6,055).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 8.1 PassMark/$ ($1,219 MSRP vs $748 MSRP).
- ❌35.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2650L better than Xeon X5660?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2650L vs Xeon X5660 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2650L
The Xeon E5-2650L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,055 points. Launch price was $142.

Xeon X5660
The Xeon X5660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,979 points. Launch price was $33.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2650L packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon X5660 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5660 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5660 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650L uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5660 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650L scores 6,055 against the Xeon X5660's 5,979 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2650L. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5660.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+39% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 20480 kB (total)+67% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,055+1% | 5,979 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2650L uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X5660 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2650L) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5660). Primary use case: Xeon X5660 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5660 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E5-2650L was priced at $748, while the Xeon X5660 came in at $1219. On launch pricing ($748 vs $1219), Xeon E5-2650L was $471 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2650L delivers 8.1 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X5660 — making the Xeon E5-2650L the 49.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $748-39% | $1219 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1+65% | 4.9 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














