Processor 300T
VS
Xeon E5-2650L

Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2650L

Intel

Processor 300T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2650L

8 Cores16 Thrd70 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Processor 300T

#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
107%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
107%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
106%
#252
Core i9-10900TE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $180
106%
#253
Core i9-12900T
MSRP: $489|Avg: $378
106%
#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
105%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
105%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
53%
#256
Ryzen 5 3500X
MSRP: $155|Avg: $171
104%
#257
Core i9-14900
MSRP: $524|Avg: $589
104%
#258
Core i5-8600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $130
103%
#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
103%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
103%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
102%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
101%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
51%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
101%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
100%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
100%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
100%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
99%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
99%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
99%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
98%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
98%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
97%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
97%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
44%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
96%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
25689%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4850%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4309%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3329%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
98%
#516
Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP: $4672|Avg: $4672
98%
#517
Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP: $3358|Avg: $196
97%
#518
Xeon E5-1680 v3
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $200
95%
#519
Xeon E5-2690 v3
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $85
95%
#520
Xeon 6780E
MSRP: $11350|Avg: $8513
94%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
92%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
92%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
100%
#918
Xeon E5410
MSRP: $256|Avg: $20
98%
#924
Xeon E5-1660
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $29
95%
#931
Xeon E5-2660 v2
MSRP: $1393|Avg: $129
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Processor 300T (2024) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightProcessor 300TXeon E5-2650L
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($82)
⚠️ Higher cost ($129)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2650L (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightProcessor 300TXeon E5-2650L
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+58%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($82)
⚠️ Higher cost ($129)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Processor 300T and Xeon E5-2650L

Intel

Processor 300T

The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.

Intel

Xeon E5-2650L

The Xeon E5-2650L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,055 points. Launch price was $142.

Processing Power

The Processor 300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L — a 38.6% clock advantage for the Processor 300T (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Processor 300T scores 6,084 against the Xeon E5-2650L's 6,055 — a 0.5% lead for the Processor 300T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300T vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L.

FeatureProcessor 300TXeon E5-2650L
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+48%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+89%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
6,084
6,055
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor 300T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureProcessor 300TXeon E5-2650L
Socket
LGA1700
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Processor 300T launched at $82 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2650L debuted at $748. At current prices ($82 vs $129), the Processor 300T is $47 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor 300T delivers 74.2 pts/$ vs 46.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650L — making the Processor 300T the 45% better value option.

FeatureProcessor 300TXeon E5-2650L
MSRP
$82-89%
$748
Avg Price (30d)
$82-36%
$129
Performance per Dollar
74.2+58%
46.9
Release Date
2024
2012