Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440

Intel

Processor 300T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2440

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Processor 300T

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $646 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).
  • Delivers 786.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 74.2 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1356 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2440 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,084 vs 6,091).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2440, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E5-2440

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 74.2 PassMark/$ ($728 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1356, while Processor 300T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2440 better than Processor 300T?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2440 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Processor 300T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2440 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2440 is still the faster CPU overall, but Processor 300T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2440 comes in 787.8% more expensive on MSRP at $728 MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Processor 300T is also 786.8% better value on MSRP (74.2 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor 300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2012) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1356. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Processor 300T

The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.

Intel

Xeon E5-2440

The Xeon E5-2440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,091 points. Launch price was $295.

Processing Power

The Processor 300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2440 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2440 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Processor 300T (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2440 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Processor 300T scores 6,084 against the Xeon E5-2440's 6,091 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2440. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300T vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440.

FeatureProcessor 300TXeon E5-2440
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+17%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+42%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
15360 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark
6,084
6,091
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor 300T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2440 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureProcessor 300TXeon E5-2440
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Processor 300T was priced at $82, while the Xeon E5-2440 came in at $728. On launch pricing ($82 vs $728), Processor 300T was $646 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor 300T delivers 74.2 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2440 — making the Processor 300T the 159.5% better value option.

FeatureProcessor 300TXeon E5-2440
MSRP
$82-89%
$728
Performance per Dollar
74.2+783%
8.4
Release Date
2024
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.