
Processor 300T

Xeon E5-2440
Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Processor 300T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $646 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 786.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 74.2 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1356 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2440 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,084 vs 6,091).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2440, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E5-2440
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 74.2 PassMark/$ ($728 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1356, while Processor 300T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2440 better than Processor 300T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor 300T vs Xeon E5-2440 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor 300T
The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.

Xeon E5-2440
The Xeon E5-2440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,091 points. Launch price was $295.
Processing Power
The Processor 300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2440 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2440 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Processor 300T (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2440 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Processor 300T scores 6,084 against the Xeon E5-2440's 6,091 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2440. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300T vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440.
| Feature | Processor 300T | Xeon E5-2440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 6,084 | 6,091 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor 300T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2440 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor 300T | Xeon E5-2440 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Processor 300T was priced at $82, while the Xeon E5-2440 came in at $728. On launch pricing ($82 vs $728), Processor 300T was $646 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor 300T delivers 74.2 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2440 — making the Processor 300T the 159.5% better value option.
| Feature | Processor 300T | Xeon E5-2440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $82-89% | $728 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.2+783% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














