
Core i7-3770S

Processor 300T
Core i7-3770S vs Processor 300T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3770S vs Processor 300T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3770S vs Processor 300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3770S
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Processor 300T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Processor 300T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 74.2 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Processor 300T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Processor 300T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $168 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 200.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 74.2 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3770S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,084 vs 6,173).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3770S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-3770S.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3770S better than Processor 300T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3770S vs Processor 300T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3770S
The Core i7-3770S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,173 points. Launch price was $330.

Processor 300T
The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3770S packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor 300T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-3770S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770S versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-3770S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770S scores 6,173 against the Processor 300T's 6,084 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-3770S. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770S vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300T.
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | Processor 300T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 6,173+1% | 6,084 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 694 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,303 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3770S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor 300T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | Processor 300T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3770S) / not specified (Processor 300T). The Core i7-3770S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Processor 300T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3770S targets Budget.
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | Processor 300T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3770S was priced at $250, while the Processor 300T came in at $82. On launch pricing ($250 vs $82), Processor 300T was $168 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770S delivers 24.7 pts/$ vs 74.2 pts/$ for the Processor 300T — making the Processor 300T the 100.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | Processor 300T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $82-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.7 | 74.2+200% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














