Core i7-3770S vs Xeon D-1622

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3770S vs Xeon D-1622 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3770S vs Xeon D-1622: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3770S

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon D-1622 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon D-1622.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,173 vs 6,205).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).
❌62.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 40W.

Xeon D-1622

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($195 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.8 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 65W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3770S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3770S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-3770S.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1622 better than Core i7-3770S?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1622 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3770S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1622 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1622 is the better buy right now. Xeon D-1622 comes in $55 cheaper on MSRP at $195 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-3770S is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 28.9% better value on MSRP (31.8 vs 24.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1622 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3770S vs Xeon D-1622 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3770S

The Core i7-3770S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,173 points. Launch price was $330.

Xeon D-1622

The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3770S and Xeon D-1622 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770S versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-3770S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon D-1622 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770S scores 6,173 against the Xeon D-1622's 6,205 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-1622. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770S vs 6 MB on the Xeon D-1622.

Feature	Core i7-3770S	Xeon D-1622
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+22%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+19%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)+33%	6 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	6,173	6,205
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	694	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,303	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3770S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1622 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3770S	Xeon D-1622
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3770S) / not specified (Xeon D-1622). The Core i7-3770S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon D-1622 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3770S targets Budget.

Feature	Core i7-3770S	Xeon D-1622
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4000	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-3770S was priced at $250, while the Xeon D-1622 came in at $195. On launch pricing ($250 vs $195), Xeon D-1622 was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770S delivers 24.7 pts/$ vs 31.8 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1622 — making the Xeon D-1622 the 25.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-3770S	Xeon D-1622
MSRP	$250	$195-22%
Performance per Dollar	24.7	31.8+29%
Release Date	2012	2019

Search Core i7-3770S on Amazon

Search Xeon D-1622 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.