
Core i7-3770S vs FX-8370

Core i7-3770S

FX-8370
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3770S is positioned at rank 691 and the FX-8370 is on rank 583, so the FX-8370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770S
Performance Per Dollar FX-8370
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3770S | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3770S | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+150%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3770S and FX-8370

Core i7-3770S
The Core i7-3770S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,173 points. Launch price was $330.

FX-8370
The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3770S packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770S versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-3770S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770S scores 6,173 against the FX-8370's 6,184 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-8370. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 4,500 vs 3,800 (16.9% advantage for the Core i7-3770S). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 694 vs 520, a 28.7% lead for the Core i7-3770S that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,303 vs 2,050 (11.6% advantage for the Core i7-3770S).
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,173 | 6,184 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,500+18% | 3,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 694+33% | 520 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,303+12% | 2,050 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3770S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3770S) vs 20 (FX-8370) — the FX-8370 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z77,H77,B75,Z68,P67,H67 (Core i7-3770S) and 970,990FX,990X (FX-8370).
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the FX-8370 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3770S) vs AMD-V (FX-8370). The Core i7-3770S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the FX-8370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3770S targets Budget, FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-3770S launched at $250 MSRP, while the FX-8370 debuted at $199. At current prices ($250 vs $100), the FX-8370 is $150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770S delivers 24.7 pts/$ vs 61.8 pts/$ for the FX-8370 — making the FX-8370 the 85.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3770S | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $199-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $100-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.7 | 61.8+150% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















