Core i7-3770S
VS
Core i7-4860HQ

Core i7-3770S vs Core i7-4860HQ

Intel

Core i7-3770S

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-4860HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3770S is positioned at rank 691 and the Core i7-4860HQ is on rank 861, so the Core i7-3770S offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12625%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11930%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8662%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2609%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2067%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1808%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1036%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1022%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
931%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
931%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
895%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
883%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
879%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
871%
#690
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
100%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#692
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
100%
#693
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#694
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
99%
#695
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
99%
#696
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
99%
#697
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#699
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#700
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#701
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
98%
#702
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#703
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
97%
#704
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
97%
#705
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4860HQ

#849
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1419%
#850
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1398%
#851
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1283%
#852
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1278%
#853
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1266%
#855
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1222%
#856
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1172%
#857
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1170%
#858
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1139%
#861
Core i7-4860HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3770S leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-4860HQ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-3770SCore i7-4860HQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3770SCore i7-4860HQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3770S and Core i7-4860HQ

Intel

Core i7-3770S

The Core i7-3770S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,173 points. Launch price was $330.

Intel

Core i7-4860HQ

The Core i7-4860HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,204 points. Launch price was $434.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3770S and Core i7-4860HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770S versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4860HQ — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-3770S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4860HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770S scores 6,173 against the Core i7-4860HQ's 6,204 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-4860HQ. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770S vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4860HQ.

FeatureCore i7-3770SCore i7-4860HQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+8%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+29%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
6,173
6,204
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,500
Geekbench 6 Single
694
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,303
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3770S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4860HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3770SCore i7-4860HQ
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3770S) / not specified (Core i7-4860HQ). The Core i7-3770S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i7-4860HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3770S targets Budget.

FeatureCore i7-3770SCore i7-4860HQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget