Core i7-4810MQ vs Processor 300T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Processor 300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Processor 300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4810MQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,074 vs 6,084).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 74.2 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Processor 300T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Processor 300T

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $296 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 361.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 74.2 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4810MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Processor 300T better than Core i7-4810MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4810MQ is ahead with a 20.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300T pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i7-4810MQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor 300T is the better buy right now. Processor 300T comes in $296 cheaper on MSRP at $82 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4810MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 361.7% better value on MSRP (74.2 vs 16.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor 300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of PGA946, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Processor 300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4810MQ

The Core i7-4810MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,074 points. Launch price was $378.

Processor 300T

The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4810MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor 300T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-4810MQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4810MQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4810MQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-4810MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4810MQ scores 6,074 against the Processor 300T's 6,084 — a 0.2% lead for the Processor 300T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4810MQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300T.

Feature	Core i7-4810MQ	Processor 300T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+12%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.4 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	6,074	6,084

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4810MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor 300T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4810MQ	Processor 300T
Socket	PGA946	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4810MQ was priced at $378, while the Processor 300T came in at $82. On launch pricing ($378 vs $82), Processor 300T was $296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4810MQ delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 74.2 pts/$ for the Processor 300T — making the Processor 300T the 128.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4810MQ	Processor 300T
MSRP	$378	$82-78%
Performance per Dollar	16.1	74.2+361%
Release Date	2014	2024

Search Core i7-4810MQ on Amazon

Search Processor 300T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.