Core i7-4810MQ vs Opteron 6344

Intel

Core i7-4810MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 6344

12 Cores12 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4810MQ vs Opteron 6344 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Opteron 6344 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Opteron 6344: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4810MQ

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $37 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $415 MSRP).
  • Delivers 9.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $415 MSRP).
  • Draws 47W instead of 115W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6344, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.

Opteron 6344

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,069 vs 6,074).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($415 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • 144.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4810MQ better than Opteron 6344?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6344 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4810MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4810MQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4810MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4810MQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-4810MQ comes in $37 cheaper on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $415 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 9.9% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 14.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4810MQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Opteron 6344 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4810MQ

The Core i7-4810MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,074 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Opteron 6344

The Opteron 6344 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,069 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4810MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6344 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6344 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4810MQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6344 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4810MQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-4810MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6344 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4810MQ scores 6,074 against the Opteron 6344's 6,069 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-4810MQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-4810MQOpteron 6344
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+19%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+8%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB (per module)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark
6,074
6,069
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4810MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6344 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4810MQOpteron 6344
Socket
PGA946
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4810MQ was priced at $378, while the Opteron 6344 came in at $415. On launch pricing ($378 vs $415), Core i7-4810MQ was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4810MQ delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Opteron 6344 — making the Core i7-4810MQ the 9.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4810MQOpteron 6344
MSRP
$378-9%
$415
Performance per Dollar
16.1+10%
14.6
Release Date
2014
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.