Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i7-4900MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i7-4900MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i7-4900MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4810MQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $192 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,074 vs 6,146).

Core i7-4900MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($570 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4900MQ better than Core i7-4810MQ?

Yes. Core i7-4900MQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4900MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4900MQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-4900MQ comes in 50.8% more expensive on MSRP at $570 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-4810MQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 49.0% better value on paper (16.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4810MQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i7-4900MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4810MQ

The Core i7-4810MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,074 points. Launch price was $378.

Core i7-4900MQ

The Core i7-4900MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,146 points. Launch price was $568.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4810MQ and Core i7-4900MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4810MQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4900MQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-4810MQ scores 6,074 against the Core i7-4900MQ's 6,146 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4900MQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4810MQ	Core i7-4900MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	6,074	6,146+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA946 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i7-4810MQ	Core i7-4900MQ
Socket	PGA946	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4810MQ was priced at $378, while the Core i7-4900MQ came in at $570. On launch pricing ($378 vs $570), Core i7-4810MQ was $192 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4810MQ delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-4900MQ — making the Core i7-4810MQ the 39.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4810MQ	Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP	$378-34%	$570
Performance per Dollar	16.1+49%	10.8
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Core i7-4810MQ on Amazon

Search Core i7-4900MQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.