Xeon E5-2658
VS
Core i7-4760HQ

Xeon E5-2658 vs Core i7-4760HQ

Intel

Xeon E5-2658

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-4760HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2658 is positioned at rank 699 and the Core i7-4760HQ is on rank 990, so the Xeon E5-2658 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2658

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13339%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2519%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2238%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1729%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
98%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
97%
#699
Xeon E5-2658
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#703
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4760HQ

#978
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2021%
#979
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1991%
#980
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1828%
#981
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1820%
#982
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1803%
#984
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1741%
#985
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1669%
#986
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1667%
#987
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1622%
#990
Core i7-4760HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
100%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
99%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
99%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
97%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
97%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
96%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($400) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2658 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2658Core i7-4760HQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4760HQ ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($400 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2658Core i7-4760HQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2658 and Core i7-4760HQ

Intel

Xeon E5-2658

The Xeon E5-2658 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,232 points. Launch price was $1,462.

Intel

Core i7-4760HQ

The Core i7-4760HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,300 points. Launch price was $434.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2658 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-4760HQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4760HQ — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4760HQ (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2658 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4760HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2658 scores 6,232 against the Core i7-4760HQ's 6,300 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-4760HQ. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4760HQ.

FeatureXeon E5-2658Core i7-4760HQ
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
20480 kB (total)+150%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
6,232
6,300+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2658 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-4760HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2658Core i7-4760HQ
Socket
LGA2011
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0