Xeon E5-2665
VS
Core i7-8809G

Xeon E5-2665 vs Core i7-8809G

Intel

Xeon E5-2665

8 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-8809G

4 Cores8 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2665 is positioned at rank 348 and the Core i7-8809G is on rank 904, so the Xeon E5-2665 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2665

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5011%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
946%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
841%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
649%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
99%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
99%
#348
Xeon E5-2665
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#362
Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-8809G

#892
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1563%
#893
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1540%
#894
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1414%
#895
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1408%
#896
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1395%
#898
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1347%
#899
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1291%
#900
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1289%
#901
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1255%
#904
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
100%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
99%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-8809G (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2665Core i7-8809G
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($450)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake G (2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2665 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2665Core i7-8809G
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($450)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2665 and Core i7-8809G

Intel

Xeon E5-2665

The Xeon E5-2665 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,293 points. Launch price was $142.

Intel

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2665 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-8809G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2665 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2665 versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-8809G (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2665 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-8809G uses Kaby Lake G (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2665 scores 8,293 against the Core i7-8809G's 8,448 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i7-8809G. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2665 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G.

FeatureXeon E5-2665Core i7-8809G
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
20480 kB (total)+150%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Kaby Lake G (2018)
PassMark
8,293
8,448+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2665 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-8809G uses FCBGA2270 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2665Core i7-8809G
Socket
LGA2011
FCBGA2270
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
384 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2665) / not specified (Core i7-8809G). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2665 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5-2665Core i7-8809G
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server