Xeon E5-2670 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Xeon E5-2670
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2670 is positioned at rank #974 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2670
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2670 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2670 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+31%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2670 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Xeon E5-2670
The Xeon E5-2670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,901 points. Launch price was $145.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,056 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2670 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G — a 24% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2670 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2670 scores 8,901 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 9,056 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670 vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2670 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 20480 kB (total)+400% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,901 | 9,056+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2670 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2670 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2670) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2670 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2670 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2670 launched at $1552 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G debuted at $149. At current prices ($60 vs $80), the Xeon E5-2670 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2670 delivers 148.3 pts/$ vs 113.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G — making the Xeon E5-2670 the 26.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2670 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1552 | $149-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-25% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 148.3+31% | 113.2 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2670 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
