Xeon E5-2680 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2680
Xeon E5-2620 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2680 is positioned at rank 1014 and the Xeon E5-2620 v4 is on rank 304, so the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2680
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2620 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2680 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($410) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2680 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+929%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($410) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2680
The Xeon E5-2680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,289 points. Launch price was $1,723.
Xeon E5-2620 v4
The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2680 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 scores 9,289 against the Xeon E5-2620 v4's 9,255 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2680. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2680 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+29% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 20 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,289 | 9,255 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 2.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2680 versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2620 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 384 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2680) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v4).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2680 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB | 1536 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 40 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2680 launched at $3226 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 debuted at $417. At current prices ($40 vs $410), the Xeon E5-2680 is $370 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2680 delivers 232.2 pts/$ vs 22.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2680 the 164.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2680 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3226 | $417-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-90% | $410 |
| Performance per Dollar | 232.2+927% | 22.6 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E5-2620 v4
