Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4309Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4309Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4309Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Silver 4309Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,718 vs 18,835).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4309Y better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4309Y is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v4 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2695 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4309Y still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Silver 4309Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4309Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4309Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.

Xeon Silver 4309Y

The Xeon Silver 4309Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 18,718 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4309Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4309Y — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4309Y (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4309Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2695 v4 scores 18,835 against the Xeon Silver 4309Y's 18,718 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4309Y.

Feature	Xeon E5-2695 v4	Xeon Silver 4309Y
Cores / Threads	18 / 36+125%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	45 MB+275%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4.5 MB+350%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	18,835	18,718

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4309Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.