Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 18,971).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2682 v4 better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2695 v4 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2682 v4 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2682 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2682 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2682 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2695 v4 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 27.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. Both are built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2682 v4 scores 18,971 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2682 v4	Xeon E5-2695 v4
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	18 / 36+13%
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+32%
Base Clock	—	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	40 MB	45 MB+13%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4.5 MB+13%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	18,971	18,835

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses the FCLGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.