Ryzen 9 4900H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

Ryzen 9 4900H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 4900H

8 / 16

18,887

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2682 v4

16 / 32

18,971

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 4900H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 4900H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 4900H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 18,971).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 4900H better than Xeon E5-2682 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2682 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 4900H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2682 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 4900H still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 4900H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 4900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 9 4900H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 4900H

The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 4900H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 — a 55.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 4900H. The Ryzen 9 4900H uses the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900H scores 18,887 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 9 4900H	Xeon E5-2682 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+76%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	40 MB+400%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4 MB+700%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	18,887	18,971

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900H uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.