Ryzen 9 4900H
VS
Xeon E5-2682 v4

Ryzen 9 4900H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2682 v4

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2682 v4

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
101%
#89
Xeon E5-2682 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
97%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 9 4900H (2020) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 9 4900HXeon E5-2682 v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) / 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 9 4900HXeon E5-2682 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 4900H and Xeon E5-2682 v4

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900H

The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 4900H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 — a 55.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 4900H. The Ryzen 9 4900H uses the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900H scores 18,887 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HXeon E5-2682 v4
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+76%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
40 MB+400%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4 MB+700%
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
18,887
18,971
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900H uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HXeon E5-2682 v4
Socket
FP6
FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0