Core Ultra 7 258V
VS
Xeon E5-2682 v4

Core Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2682 v4

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 258V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
108%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
106%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
104%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
103%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
99%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
95%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
93%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
92%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2682 v4

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
101%
#89
Xeon E5-2682 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
97%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 258V (2024) utilizes 3 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 258VXeon E5-2682 v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 258VXeon E5-2682 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 258V and Xeon E5-2682 v4

Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 258V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 — a 63% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 258V. The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 258V scores 18,947 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VXeon E5-2682 v4
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+92%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
40 MB+233%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
4 MB+60%
Process
3 nm-79%
14 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
18,947
18,971
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,750
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VXeon E5-2682 v4
Socket
FCBGA2833
FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V) / not specified (Xeon E5-2682 v4). The Core Ultra 7 258V includes integrated graphics (Arc 140V), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VXeon E5-2682 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming