
Core Ultra 7 258V

Xeon W-1290E
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon W-1290E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon W-1290E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon W-1290E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 95W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 140V, while Xeon W-1290E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,947 vs 19,060).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290E, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Xeon W-1290E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-1290E
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌458.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 258V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 258V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1290E better than Core Ultra 7 258V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon W-1290E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 258V
The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1290E
The Xeon W-1290E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,060 points. Launch price was $552.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 258V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-1290E offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1290E — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon W-1290E uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 258V scores 18,947 against the Xeon W-1290E's 19,060 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-1290E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290E.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+59% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+900% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 18,947 | 19,060 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,750 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290E uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V) / not specified (Xeon W-1290E). The Core Ultra 7 258V includes integrated graphics (Arc 140V), while the Xeon W-1290E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc 140V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













