
Core Ultra 7 258V

Ryzen 7 7445HS
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024Why buy it
- β Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP7r2 and older memory support.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 140V, while Ryzen 7 7445HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (18,947 vs 19,008).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- β +0.3% higher PassMark.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- β105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- βOlder platform position on FP7/FP7r2, while Core Ultra 7 258V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 258V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 258V better than Ryzen 7 7445HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 258V
The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7445HS
The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023β2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 258V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7445HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core Ultra 7 258V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS β a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 258V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses Phoenix (2023β2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 258V scores 18,947 against the Ryzen 7 7445HS's 19,008 β a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7445HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+2% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 6 MB+140% |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Phoenix (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 18,947 | 19,008 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,000 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,750 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7445HS). The Core Ultra 7 258V includes integrated graphics (Arc 140V), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Arc 140V | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













