Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2698 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon E5-2698 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,870 vs 18,971).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2682 v4 better than Xeon E5-2698 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2698 v3 is ahead with a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2682 v4 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2682 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2682 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2682 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2682 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2698 v3

The Xeon E5-2698 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,870 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Xeon E5-2698 v3 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v3 — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2698 v3. The Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2682 v4 scores 18,971 against the Xeon E5-2698 v3's 18,870 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698 v3.

Feature	Xeon E5-2682 v4	Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock	—	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	40 MB	40 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	18,971	18,870

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses the FCLGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.