Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon W-1350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon W-1350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon W-1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.

Xeon W-1350

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2695 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,742 vs 18,835).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2695 v4 better than Xeon W-1350?

Yes. Xeon E5-2695 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2695 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2695 v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1350 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2695 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $255 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1350 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Xeon W-1350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 41% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2695 v4 scores 18,835 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.

Feature	Xeon E5-2695 v4	Xeon W-1350
Cores / Threads	18 / 36+200%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	5 GHz+52%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	45 MB+275%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4.5 MB+800%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	18,835	18,742
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,140
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,104

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2695 v4	Xeon W-1350
Socket	LGA2011	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4) / Yes (Xeon W-1350). The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.